Showing posts with label Evaluation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Evaluation. Show all posts

Tuesday, 1 November 2016

Condensed Evaluation

Creative Essay Evaluation

Through our research, we discovered that some synaesthetes express themselves through painting, which we believed would make an interesting subject area for our moving image piece. After some idea development, we decided to find some actors to paint us an image as we filmed them ‘reacting’ to a piece of music to represent the process that a synaesthete would go through. However, doing this did not feel as though we were creating an authentic, innovative piece of film, so we decided to be ambitious, going a step further and finding real synaesthetes to feature. Using actual synaesthetes gave the piece a much more authentic feel, and helped us to better achieve what we originally set out to do – to highlight the individuality of the synaesthetic experience. In addition, this also increased the enjoyment of the film making process for us as a group, as we felt a stronger connection to the topic and an excitement to see the results of our experiment.

One aspect that we feel could be improved in our piece was the diegetic audio. We used a Zoom mic to record our audio, but noticed quite a lot of background noise, which we luckily managed to reduce in post. After reviewing our audio from Millie’s interview we were a lot more careful when recording Tim’s audio the following week. In retrospect, we should have used a boom pole to record our audio and maybe done a few more takes so we had more audio to work with.

Another issue that we had was matching the colours of the shots taken on Shantel’s camera to Kieran’s. Although we ensured to keep the white balance and general camera settings indentical, using different apertures and ISO’s caused issues matching exposures within shots. However, this is something that we could fix in post. The process of doing test shoots prior to this enabled us to create a more refined final product, by allowing us to amend issues and create more informed decisions, such as using a clean-looking, white background rather than coloured gels to provide a focus on the art produced.


Overall we feel our project has achieved what we intended it to and it is effective in providing an insight into the phenomenon of sound-colour synaesthesia.

Evaluation

Creative Essay Evaluation

We were very lucky with the group we were put in. Once we read the brief and started discussing we realised we had very similar interests and ideas. The first time we met we stated our strengths and weaknesses. This was extremely useful because then we knew who would be strongest at most and what areas people would need help in. I think we all had a similar creative vision, once we started bouncing ideas off each other I realised how fun this project was going to be. 
After our visit to the Tate we had all decided we definitely wanted to do a piece about colour, something with lots of visuals. 

Our project did change from our initial idea. Our first idea was to have someone against a plain white background, dressed in very plain colours, having paint thrown over them. The different coloured paint was to represent the sounds, feelings, shapes etc of the Synaethesia. Throwing the paint at the person was supposed to represent them reacting to the music, as if the colours and sounds were hitting them. We all really liked this idea and were quite set on creating it, but after tutorials, lots of other discussions and further research, we decided against it. The idea could of come across as quite complicated, and perhaps the craziness of it would of lost the meaning of the piece. We wanted to create something simple but effective, something the audience could understand.

Another idea we had was to somehow get our hands on a real brain. We thought we could use some kind of dye or food colouring to highlight parts of the brain as they were being activated by the music, showing which parts of the brain work with Synaethesia. I wasn't too keen on this idea because I don't like the idea of using a real brain, I didn't really want to touch one. We then thought we could use a fake brain and I even found one in a shop called Tiger. We didn't go with this idea and I'm glad. I think the whole process would of been really messy and the video could of come across as a bit gory. 

The final idea that we went with was the find some actors to paint us an image as we filmed them. After lots of research we discovered that most Synaesthetes convey their senses/feelings through painting. We weren't planning on having actual Synaethetes to paint for us, but Kieran emailed the UK Synaesthesia Association and they told us they had people who were happy to help. I’m so glad we didn't stick with the original plan of actors because it gives the film more depth, and adds to the authenticity. We picked out a piece of music for them to paint with, making sure they didn't listen to it until we were filming. 

A lot of research was put into the piece and I think we have captured our message perfectly. I’m extremely glad we changed our ideas a couple of times, as I think this final product is much better than we’d planned. Our first idea wasn't going to explore Synaethesia enough, it was more about the aesthetics and physical appearance, we hadn't conducted enough research when we came up with it. 

We had some issues with audio. It was a last minute decision to do an interview so we didn't plan it well enough. We used a zoom mic to record our audio, but theres quite a lot of background noise, Millie also talks quite fast, but we have slowed it down in post. After we reviewed our audio from Millie’s interview we were a lot more careful with Tim’s audio, we tried to hold the mic further away and not create any background noise. During the edit we tried to remove some of the background noise, we faded clips and played around with the levels. I think looking back, we should have used a boom pole to record our audio and maybe done a few more takes so we had more audio to work with.


Kieran and Shantel used different camera’s for filming so the clips were different colours. Millie’s clips were especially yellow compared to Tim’s. Luckily we were able to colour correct the clips in post, and when we were filming Tim, Kieran and Shantel set their cameras to the same settings so the clips would match. We also had some lighting issues. For our test shots we played around with gels and found some really nice pink lighting that we wanted to use. After further discussion we actually decided against the pink gels, we didn't want it to look to gender associated and we wanted the white of the canvas to stand out as much as possible, in order to emphasise the main focus of the film - the paintings. We had lots of problems with shadows, wherever we placed the lights there seemed to be a shadow from the canvas on the back wall. Sarah (technician) showed us that by pointing the lights towards the ceiling we could remove the shadows. This also created a really nice, natural lighting that fir perfectly with what we wanted. We wanted the painting to be the part that stands out the most, so by use soft, natural looking lighting we could create this. 

Wednesday, 26 October 2016

Template For Evaluation

Possible questions to answer 
  • What was your Initial reaction towards the brief 
  • How did you feel working with your chosen group from the start to the end of the process? 
  • How have you developed your ideas and how did your work change throughout the project? 
  • What were the strengths and weakness of working in your group. 
  • How have your skills developed during the project when working with your group? 
Possible questions for the final piece 
  • What equipment did you use, and why? Did they work successfully? 
  • What meaning and messages did you want to convey and were you successful? 
  • Are you happy with your final piece? Are there any elements you like in particular? 
  • Is there anything you would change? Why 
Final question  
  • how was your overall experience in working with your group?